<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 503 Service Unavailable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rg03.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rg03.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>This is my blog&#039;s tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Mercurial vs Git by Scott Johnson</title>
		<link>http://rg03.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/mercurial-vs-git/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rg03.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-99</guid>
		<description>One thing to consider when choosing a DVCS is community support. For example, in the Rails community, Git is nearly universal, and Mercurial nearly unheard of. Anybody developing a Rails project should understand Git for this reason alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to consider when choosing a DVCS is community support. For example, in the Rails community, Git is nearly universal, and Mercurial nearly unheard of. Anybody developing a Rails project should understand Git for this reason alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mercurial vs Git by uwe</title>
		<link>http://rg03.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/mercurial-vs-git/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>uwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rg03.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-98</guid>
		<description>awesome work, thanks. looks like mercurial is the way to go FOR ME. i loved reading your objective, reasonable comparison that really stands out in the time of GIT hype all around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome work, thanks. looks like mercurial is the way to go FOR ME. i loved reading your objective, reasonable comparison that really stands out in the time of GIT hype all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New tiny project: lddsafe by Ivan Mironov</title>
		<link>http://rg03.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/new-tiny-project-lddsafe/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Mironov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rg03.wordpress.com/?p=174#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I sent a few patches for lddsafe to you by email (which is listed on the page &quot;Contact me&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent a few patches for lddsafe to you by email (which is listed on the page &#8220;Contact me&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mercurial vs Git by Ben Curtis</title>
		<link>http://rg03.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/mercurial-vs-git/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rg03.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Thank you, thank you! This rational and balanced comparison of these two DVCSs is exactly what I had been searching for. I was beginning to despair after reading a dozen biased reports, each declaring a different &quot;winner&quot; for different reasons. This welcome comparison has really helped me see what features I value (or, that I think I value) in a DVCS, and how these two compare. I am now much better armed in my exploration away from Subversion, and I&#039;ll probably try both Mercurial and Git — but now I know what sorts of things to focus on when making a decisions between these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you! This rational and balanced comparison of these two DVCSs is exactly what I had been searching for. I was beginning to despair after reading a dozen biased reports, each declaring a different &#8220;winner&#8221; for different reasons. This welcome comparison has really helped me see what features I value (or, that I think I value) in a DVCS, and how these two compare. I am now much better armed in my exploration away from Subversion, and I&#8217;ll probably try both Mercurial and Git — but now I know what sorts of things to focus on when making a decisions between these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mercurial vs Git by Dilipm79</title>
		<link>http://rg03.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/mercurial-vs-git/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilipm79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rg03.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-77</guid>
		<description>This is the most comprehensive info on both systems,,finally I understood something, than ppl just explain why Hg is great than git...and vice versa. This is a mandatory doc for someone who is about to start on dvcs. Make sure that you read all hlinks ove

This is a best comprehensive doc, I have ever come across...great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most comprehensive info on both systems,,finally I understood something, than ppl just explain why Hg is great than git&#8230;and vice versa. This is a mandatory doc for someone who is about to start on dvcs. Make sure that you read all hlinks ove</p>
<p>This is a best comprehensive doc, I have ever come across&#8230;great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mercurial vs Git by Jayme Davis</title>
		<link>http://rg03.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/mercurial-vs-git/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayme Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rg03.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Thanks - great info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; great info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mercurial vs Git by Jop</title>
		<link>http://rg03.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/mercurial-vs-git/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Jop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rg03.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the clear and informative comparison, and the additional resources. Very useful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the clear and informative comparison, and the additional resources. Very useful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mercurial vs Git by Chrispy</title>
		<link>http://rg03.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/mercurial-vs-git/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrispy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rg03.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-35</guid>
		<description>This is a great overview of these source control systems.  I&#039;ve just started looking at a new source control to simplify branching and merging over SVN and this was just what I needed to get a brief overview of the similarity and differences between Git and Mercurial.  Thanks so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great overview of these source control systems.  I&#8217;ve just started looking at a new source control to simplify branching and merging over SVN and this was just what I needed to get a brief overview of the similarity and differences between Git and Mercurial.  Thanks so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
